Dear Friends:
Thank you for your comments on the proposed fare increase/restructuring for AC
Transit. As most of you understood, in March the AC Board was setting the date
of, and the parameters for, the fare hearing. The fare hearing will be on 18 May
at 3:00 and 6:00 p.m. (probably at the Scottish Rite Center on Lakeshore in
Oakland, but AC staff is still confirming the location). (More on the hearing
below.)
The Range Of Proposals
The Board established a broad set of parameters in the form of five fare
proposals. To give you an idea of the ranges:
- The adult single ride cash fare ranges from one dollar to two dollars;
- The adult transfer ranges from unavailable to 50 cents;
- The adult 7-day pass ranges from unavailable to $20;
- The adult 31-day pass ranges from unavailable to $70;
- The student cash fare ranges from 50 cents to 85 cents;
- The student monthly pass ranges from unavailable to $15;
- Adult transbay single ride cash ranges from $2 to $3;
- Adult transbay 31-day pass ranges from unavailable to $116.
The above does not include all elements of all of the proposals, but gives you
some idea of the ranges. We are even considering another parcel tax to make
student transportation free as a partial solution. In all cases, pursuant to
federal law, the senior/disabled fares are at most half of the regular adult
fare for the same category. In most proposals the monthly senior/disabled
sticker remain at $20, a much greater discount than required. In all proposals
the UC Class and Bear passes and the Berkeley Eco passes would remain.
AC staff is in the process of producing information and brochures that set out
the alternatives in detail. I encourage you to check the AC Transit web site (www.actransit.org)
to download and review the proposals.
In the end, the Board can "mix and match" elements from the various proposals so
long as all elements of the new fares are within the parameters available for
public comment at the hearing.
AC's Financial Status
Whatever combination is chosen, it will need to raise between $4 and $8 million
per year. The economy and our sales tax income have gone up slightly, and the
voters have been very generous with some small property tax increases, but our
income picture is still not healthy and our expenses continue to go up. Just
three examples.
During the past three years the Metropolitan Transportation Commission ("MTC")
has allowed us to take advantage of a federal program that provides flexibility
to use some of our capital funding for current expenses to the tune of almost
$20 million in some years. That flexibility (and the capital funding that
supported it) will no longer be available to the extent it has been.
The price of diesel fuel has doubled in the past two years (we use almost 20,000
gallons of diesel a day). In the past three years our health care costs have
gone up over 40% and we have been told to expect double digit increases for the
foreseeable future. All of these costs are the result of factors far beyond the
control of the AC Board.
The Fare Hearing And Other Public Involvement
As I noted above, the public hearing on the fare proposals will be on 18 May. I
encourage you to submit written comments and/or come and testify at the hearing.
To be most helpful, your testimony should address the specific elements of the
proposals. For example: Do you pay a cash fare because you can't afford a 31-day
pass, but you could afford a 7-day pass? How many buses to you ride to make your
daily trip? How many trips to you make in an average day? To and from work?
Shopping? Social activities? Have you ever stayed home because you could not
afford bus fare? Do you buy a 31-day pass for convenience even though in some
months it would be cheaper to pay cash fare every day? Why don't you buy a 31-day
pass even though it is much cheaper than paying cash fare (particularly
applicable to students)? Would having a plastic card on which you store money so
that you did not have to deal with cash change your views on any of the above?
You might also comment on some broader questions: What should the AC Board
consider success -- If we make more money, but generate fewer trips, is that a
success? If we make more money and generate more trips, but some people have to
stay home a lot more, is that a success? How do we measure any of that?
For the activist groups among you, I encourage you to analyze the data provided
by our finance department in the GM Memos to the board, the data provided in our
last rider survey, the reports from our free student pass experiment along with
information available from national sources and whatever other resources you
have and provide data as to how the various elements of the fare proposals might
affect different groups of people.
Although the testimony at the public hearing is important to get your views on
record, in the end it is a frustrating and unsatisfying process. For legal and
practical reasons, the Board sits up on the stage and listens to your 2 minutes
of testimony without any immediate comment.
At the end of both parts of the hearing, when most rational people have gone
home to their families, the staff makes preliminary responses to the more
frequently expressed comments and the Board members make some initial comments -
often surprisingly cogent given how exhausted we are. Both staff and the Board
comment further and the Board votes at a following meeting.
For a more interactive (and hopefully more satisfying) discussion, staff members
are available to come to any group's meeting to give their explanation of the
various proposals and listen to comments. I, and most of my fellow board members,
are also willing to come to group meetings and talk with you. To talk with staff
or arrange for a staff member to come to your meeting please contact Deputy
General Manager Jim Glitch at jgleich@actransit.org or 510-891-7185. To arrange
for a Board member to come to your meeting please contact District Secretary
Rose Martinez at rmartine@actransit.org or 510-891-7284.
Thank you for your continued interest in AC Transit and I hope to see you at one
of the community group meetings.
-- Chris Peeples -- |
|